![]() ![]() It really peeves me when people make comparisons like this. While 800 and 700 are the most popular options for the 737 in real life, and consequently in FS, 600 is especially an oddball in both realms, and there is only a couple of people that fly it primarily, even less so are TOPCAT users, or perspective users.Ask yourself, would you be willing to spend additional tens, if not hundred of dollars to offset the development cost for the author? Not to mention that there are other, more desired types, such as 777 (which will be even more desired as PMDG nears completition), AIrbus family, or E-jet family (the last two admittedly being problematic in regard to data sourcing, not having the likes of Boeings FPPMs available) The amount of data in TOPCAT is unprecedent, and so is the amount of work needed to integrate an aircraft type.Even if FPPM was readily provided to TOPCAT authors (who are now busy finishing the other project, PFPX), for example via the way of PMDGs (who I hear are fans of the program) Boeing connections, there is still no commercial basis for inclusion of 600 and 900. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |